*Online Consultations Available
*Online Consultations Available
1,000+ Shoulder Surgeries performed
Rehab-Integrated

Care
Outcomes Tracked for 5 Years
Shoulder instability — including recurrent dislocation and anterior shoulder instability — develops when the structural restraints that keep the ball of the shoulder (humeral head) seated in the socket (glenoid) are damaged or insufficient, allowing the joint to partially or fully displace with activity or minimal force.
Â
MRI arthrogram and CT can describe shoulder instability across six factors:
Shoulder instability involves damage to one or more stabilizing structures — and MRI arthrogram may show a combination of injuries that together determine the appropriate surgical approach.
A. Bankart Lesion — Anterior Labral Detachment
Glenoid bone loss — measured on CT with 3D reconstruction — is the most critical factor in surgical planning for shoulder instability. Bone loss percentage determines whether soft tissue Bankart repair is sufficient or whether bone reconstruction (Latarjet or glenoid grafting) is required.
Â
The pattern and timeline of dislocation events determines the degree of cumulative structural damage and influences surgical planning.
Â
The direction and mechanism of instability determines which structures are primarily damaged and which surgical approach is appropriate.
The biological condition of the labrum, capsule, and surrounding structures determines whether repair is feasible and what technique is most appropriate.
Shoulder instability produces not only structural damage but also a distinct psychological dimension — fear of re-dislocation, avoidance behavior, and loss of shoulder confidence — that is uniquely prominent in this condition and must be understood as part of the clinical picture.
When constant apprehension — the clinical fear of re-dislocation — significantly restricts daily life, sport participation, and psychological wellbeing, it is itself a valid surgical consideration alongside structural pathology. Surgery that eliminates apprehension and restores shoulder confidence is a meaningful functional outcome for this population.
*Same-day consultations may be available
Even though MRI arthrogram and CT provide valuable structural information, they do not establish a complete diagnosis on their own — shoulder instability must be interpreted alongside the patient’s dislocation history, bone loss measurements, tissue quality, functional limitations, and the psychological impact of living with an unreliable shoulder, all integrated by a specialist through a comprehensive clinical evaluation that includes apprehension, relocation, and load-and-shift testing.
Structural instability does not reliably resolve without treatment — the underlying damage that causes recurrent dislocation (detached labrum, attenuated capsule, cumulative bone loss) does not repair itself, and while some patients compensate through muscle activation and activity modification, the pattern in most young active patients is progressive: each episode becomes easier to provoke, adds more structural damage, and makes eventual reconstruction more complex. A comprehensive evaluation by a shoulder instability specialist can determine whether your specific pattern carries a high re-dislocation risk and what the appropriate intervention timeline is.
The risks of untreated recurrent shoulder instability are both structural and functional — and they compound over time.
Â
Each dislocation event erodes the anterior glenoid rim — progressively converting a soft tissue injury into a bone loss problem that requires more complex reconstruction. A patient whose first dislocation could have been addressed with a 45-minute arthroscopic repair may face a 90-minute open Latarjet procedure after three or four events. The progressive ease of dislocation — requiring less force with each event — is a structural signal that the joint is losing its remaining restraints.
When instability is left untreated, the following structural and functional changes develop:
Â
Â
In daily life
Â
Â
Sports & performance
Â
Â
As bone loss accumulates and instability worsens, the reconstruction required becomes more complex and the probability of full return to sport decreases. The window for the simplest, most effective surgery narrows with each dislocation.
Appropriate treatment for shoulder instability depends on multiple factors — including the number and mechanism of dislocation events, glenoid bone loss percentage, Hill-Sachs engagement, labral tissue quality, activity demands, and the patient’s short- and long-term goals.
For some patients — particularly first-time dislocators who are older, lower-activity, or not involved in contact sports — structured physical therapy and a supervised rehabilitation program may be appropriate as an initial management approach. It is important, however, to understand precisely what therapy can and cannot accomplish.
A well-designed rehabilitation program can:
Â
Â
Some patients experience meaningful functional improvement within 6–12 weeks when therapy is structured and progressive.
Physical therapy alone may be less appropriate when:
Â
Â
For working adults, military personnel, and athletes, the decision to pursue surgical stabilization is often practical: the shoulder is no longer meeting the demands of work, training, or daily activity — and conservative management has demonstrated its structural limits. Persistent instability after a structured program is a structural signal, not a rehabilitation failure.
When shoulder instability causes recurrent dislocation, involves labral detachment, or has failed conservative management — and glenoid bone loss is within the range where soft tissue repair is reliable — arthroscopic Bankart repair reattaches the torn labrum and its attached stabilizing ligament to restore structural glenohumeral stability.
Arthroscopic Bankart repair reattaches the torn anterior labrum and the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) back to the front of the shoulder socket using small suture anchors placed in the glenoid rim.
Â
If the labrum has displaced medially (ALPSA pattern), it is mobilized and reduced to the rim before fixation. If capsular laxity or a rotator interval defect is present, the appropriate tightening is performed alongside the repair.
When the labrum is reattached to the glenoid rim:
Â
Â
For most patients, successful repair results in:
Â
Outcomes depend on glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs engagement, tissue quality, timing, and the surgeon’s specific experience with instability cases.
Bankart repair is performed arthroscopically through small incisions using a specialized camera.
Â
The procedure is typically performed under regional anesthesia with sedation or general anesthesia.
Â
During surgery, the surgeon:
Â
Small anchors — typically biocomposite or titanium — are placed into the prepared glenoid rim at the labrum’s original attachment site. Sutures threaded through these anchors secure the labrum back to bone under controlled tension, restoring the cartilage bumper and ligamentous restraint.
Â
At The Joint Preservation Center, anchor number and configuration are selected based on the extent of labral detachment, capsular laxity, and the specific dislocation pattern.
The repair is inspected for secure fixation and appropriate capsular tension under simulated loading before closure.
Â
The procedure typically takes one to one and a half hours. Healing occurs gradually over several months as the labrum integrates into the glenoid bone.
Pain and Early Recovery After Surgery
Â
Most patients experience moderate discomfort in the first several days, managed with regional anesthesia, oral medication, and icing.
Â
A sling is worn to protect the repair, typically for 4–6 weeks. The purpose of the sling is to prevent early strain on the healing labrum.
Â
Pain typically improves steadily over the first 1–2 weeks. Sleeping in a slightly upright position is most comfortable during the early phase.
Bankart repair heals in phases. Although the labrum is secured during surgery, biological integration to the glenoid bone takes time.
Â
Phase 1: Protection and Passive Motion (Weeks 0–4/6)
Gentle guided movement begins early to prevent stiffness while protecting the repair.
Â
Phase 2: Active Motion (Weeks 4/6–8/10)
You begin moving the shoulder under your own power as healing progresses.
Â
Phase 3: Strengthening (After approximately 10–12 weeks)
Controlled strengthening begins as the labrum integrates biologically. Rotator cuff and scapular stabilizer strength are rebuilt progressively.
Drive?
Usually when out of the sling and off narcotic medication — typically 4–6 weeks.
Â
Return to desk work?
Often within 1–2 weeks, depending on comfort.
Â
Return to manual labor?
Typically 3–4 months, depending on physical demands.
Â
Return to sport?
Non-contact activities may resume gradually around 4–5 months. Contact and collision sports — football, wrestling, rugby, MMA — typically require 5–6 months based on objective strength milestones, not time alone. Latarjet cases: see Section 8.
Evidence shows that untreated shoulder instability can:
Â
Â
These structural changes may reduce the effectiveness of surgery and increase reconstruction complexity. Every dislocation narrows the surgical options available.
One of the most common concerns for working adults considering shoulder stabilization is timing: how to schedule the procedure around professional obligations, minimize income disruption, and plan for the weeks when full function is not yet restored.
Â
Desk work and computer-based roles:
Most patients return to desk work within 1–2 weeks, working one-handed or with limited arm use initially. Two-handed typing is generally comfortable within 3–4 weeks.
Â
Supervisory, managerial, or client-facing roles:
If your work does not require physical lifting, return within 1–2 weeks is typical. Driving is usually possible once the sling is discontinued and narcotic medication is no longer needed, generally within 4–6 weeks.
Â
Manual labor, construction, trades, or physical occupations:
Return to light duty may be possible within 2–3 months. Return to full overhead or heavy lifting duties typically requires 4–6 months. Some employers offer modified duty during this transition.
Â
Work restrictions documentation:
We provide work restriction letters and return-to-work clearance documentation as needed for your employer or occupational health department.
Return-to-sport timelines depend on the demands of your activity, the complexity of your stabilization procedure, and your progress through rehabilitation milestones.
These timelines are approximations. Your specific return-to-sport plan is developed collaboratively between Dr. Turkula and your physical therapist based on objective strength and confidence milestones.
Preparing your home and support system before surgery helps the early recovery period go more smoothly. Because you will be in a sling and restricted from using your operative arm for several weeks, some advance planning makes a meaningful difference:
Â
Â
Patients who plan ahead consistently report a smoother, less stressful early recovery.
Recovery after shoulder stabilization varies depending on the extent of labral injury, bone loss, and the specific procedure performed.
Â
While general timelines can be helpful for orientation, your recovery plan will be personalized. Your surgeon will guide you through a protocol tailored to your shoulder, your goals, and your lifestyle.
Week 1: Sling at all times. Pain management with medication, icing, and rest. Gentle pendulum exercises as directed. Most discomfort resolves significantly by day 5–7.
Â
Weeks 2–3: First postoperative visit. Passive range-of-motion exercises with a therapist begin. Pain continues to improve. Desk work may resume if comfortable.
Â
Weeks 4–6: Gradual progression of passive and assisted motion. Sling is typically discontinued. Driving may resume once sling is off and narcotic medication is no longer needed.
Â
Weeks 6–10: Transition to active motion. Daily activities become noticeably easier. Apprehension typically begins resolving as healing progresses.
Â
Weeks 10–16: Strengthening begins. Rotator cuff and scapular stabilizer exercises rebuild shoulder strength and neuromuscular control.
Â
Months 4–5: Progressive sport-specific or job-specific rehabilitation. Non-contact sport return for eligible patients.
Â
Months 5–6: Contact sport return criteria assessment — strength and functional testing. Full contact clearance for most Bankart repair patients.
Â
Months 6–12: Continued strength gains. Full confidence with high-demand activities. Apprehension is typically fully resolved by 9–12 months in successful cases.
Not every shoulder dislocation or instability case can be addressed with standard arthroscopic Bankart repair — significant glenoid bone loss, engaging Hill-Sachs defects, complex lesion variants, failed prior stabilization, and combined structural injuries each present distinct challenges that require advanced techniques and specialized experience, which is why at The Joint Preservation Center we evaluate the full spectrum of instability pathology and offer the procedure most appropriate for your specific anatomy and dislocation history, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
When glenoid bone loss exceeds the threshold at which soft tissue repair alone becomes unreliable — typically 20–25% of the glenoid surface area — or when other factors make Bankart repair insufficient, the Latarjet procedure transfers the coracoid bone along with its attached conjoined tendon to the deficient anterior glenoid, achieving two stabilizing effects simultaneously: the bone graft restores the missing glenoid arc, and the conjoined tendon creates a dynamic sling that tightens precisely when the arm is in the vulnerable abducted-externally-rotated position.
Â
Who Is a Candidate for the Latarjet Procedure?


The Latarjet may be appropriate for patients with glenoid bone loss exceeding approximately 20–25%, an inverted pear glenoid on CT, a failed prior arthroscopic Bankart repair, a high-demand contact sport athlete with subcritical bone loss and an engaging Hill-Sachs defect, or chronic instability with significant labral degeneration.
Latarjet Recovery for Active Adults
Â
Sling immobilization is typically 4–6 weeks. Passive motion begins early. Active strengthening begins around weeks 10–12 after bone graft healing is confirmed on imaging. Return to contact sport typically requires 6–9 months with CT confirmation of graft incorporation before clearance.
When a Hill-Sachs defect on the back of the humeral head is ‘engaging’ — locking over the glenoid rim during movement and predisposing to re-dislocation even after labral repair — remplissage can address this humeral-side contribution to instability.
Â
Remplissage fills the Hill-Sachs defect by arthroscopically suturing the posterior capsule and infraspinatus tendon into the bony cavity, converting the engaging pattern into a non-engaging one. The procedure is performed during the same operation as Bankart repair, adding approximately 20–30 minutes.
Â
Who Is a Candidate for Remplissage?
Â
Remplissage may be appropriate when glenoid bone loss is below the Latarjet threshold, the Hill-Sachs lesion is engaging on CT assessment, and the combined arthroscopic approach can address both labral and humeral-head pathology in a single operation. For overhead athletes, the decision between remplissage and Latarjet requires individualized analysis, as remplissage may modestly reduce end-range external rotation.
Â
Recovery
Â
Recovery following combined Bankart repair with remplissage follows a similar phased protocol to standard Bankart repair, with timelines adjusted for the combined procedure’s complexity.
Many shoulder instability presentations do not occur in isolation. MRI arthrogram and CT frequently reveal concurrent pathology — a bony Bankart alongside a Hill-Sachs, HAGL alongside anterior labral detachment, or rotator cuff involvement in higher-energy mechanisms. Addressing only one component when multiple structures are compromised may leave residual instability.
Bankart Repair with Capsulorrhaphy

Â
When capsular laxity is identified alongside labral detachment — particularly in patients with multiple prior dislocations — capsulorrhaphy (surgical tightening of the capsule) is performed alongside labral repair to restore both structural and capsular components of shoulder stability.
Bony Bankart Repair

Â
When a bony Bankart fragment is present — a bone chip avulsed from the anterior glenoid with the labrum — the fragment is reduced and stabilized with suture anchors. When bone loss is above the threshold that soft tissue repair can reliably address, Latarjet or glenoid grafting replaces the missing bone arc.
Bankart Repair with HAGL Repair

Â
A HAGL lesion — humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament — is a less common but frequently missed contributor to failed Bankart repair. When HAGL is identified on MRI arthrogram, it is repaired at the humeral side using a separate anchor configuration during the same procedure.
Capsular shift surgery addresses instability driven primarily by capsular laxity — where the joint capsule is stretched beyond its functional restraining capacity — rather than purely by labral detachment. The capsule is surgically tightened and reattached to reduce the volume of the joint and restore the appropriate tension in the glenohumeral ligament complex.
Capsulolabral reconstruction addresses the combined failure of the labral anchor and capsular restraint — typically in patients with recurrent instability, multiple prior events, or labral degeneration that has compromised tissue quality to the point where simple reattachment is insufficient.
Â
Who Is a Candidate?
Â
Capsular shift may be appropriate for patients with multidirectional laxity contributing to anterior instability, significant capsular attenuation from recurrent dislocations, or as an adjunct to labral repair when capsular tension is identified as a primary instability contributor.
Some patients present with shoulder instability in both shoulders — particularly those with underlying capsular laxity or contact sport careers with dislocation events on both sides. Bilateral instability is managed with a staged approach: one shoulder is stabilized first, and the second is addressed after the first has recovered sufficiently to manage daily activities. We develop a plan that sequences bilateral procedures to minimize cumulative downtime.
A Bankart repair or stabilization procedure that does not hold — due to missed bone loss, anchor failure, a new traumatic event, or a HAGL lesion that was not identified — leaves patients with persistent instability after already making the recovery investment. For working adults and athletes, a failed primary stabilization is especially disruptive.
Â
When Is Revision Surgery Appropriate?
Â
Revision stabilization may be considered when imaging confirms structural failure of the primary repair, instability has not resolved after adequate postoperative rehabilitation, and the remaining anatomy supports a revision procedure. We evaluate revision cases with MRI arthrogram and CT 3D reconstruction to assess current bone loss — which may have increased since the primary surgery — and to determine what contributed to the initial failure.
Â
Signs of Repair Failure to Watch For
Â
Return of apprehension or dislocation after an initial period of improvement, inability to progress through rehabilitation milestones, a specific re-injury event with immediate loss of stability, or recurrent dislocation in the months after primary repair — any of these warrant reevaluation.
Â
Revision Approaches
Â
Depending on the revision scenario, we may convert to the Latarjet procedure — the most common revision pathway after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair — perform revision arthroscopic repair in select cases with specific technical failure, use glenoid bone grafting (Eden-Hybinette or distal tibial allograft) for massive bone loss, or perform capsular reconstruction where capsular insufficiency is a primary factor.
Fear of re-dislocation is not a secondary concern — it is a primary symptom of shoulder instability that warrants the same clinical attention as structural damage.
Apprehension — the strong, often overwhelming sense that the shoulder is about to come out — is both a clinical sign and a lived experience. Patients describe guarding overhead movements, sleeping in uncomfortable positions to protect the shoulder, withdrawing from sport and contact activities, and avoiding handshakes, reaching tasks, or any position where the arm is externally rotated and elevated.
Â
A positive apprehension test on physical examination — where the patient resists or becomes alarmed with the arm placed in the vulnerable position — is a confirmed clinical finding of structural instability. It is not a psychological overreaction; it is the body correctly recognizing that the structural restraints against dislocation are compromised.
The behavioral consequences of recurrent dislocation and constant apprehension are significant and often underreported:
Â
For patients whose primary burden is apprehension and avoidance — rather than pain or dislocation frequency — surgical stabilization can be the most meaningful intervention available. Successful Bankart repair or Latarjet procedure resolves apprehension in the majority of appropriately selected patients, allowing full return to overhead activity, sport, and daily function without the constant anticipatory fear that precedes and follows each dislocation event.
Â
At The Joint Preservation Center, we treat apprehension as a serious functional and quality-of-life concern — not a secondary finding. If fear of re-dislocation is your primary reason for seeking evaluation, it is a valid reason to be here.
Â
Fear resolution after shoulder stabilization surgery is one of the outcome measures we track — because a shoulder you can trust again is the true measure of a successful result.
Modern arthroscopic and open stabilization techniques are associated with:
High rates of re-dislocation prevention
Significant gains in shoulder confidence and function
Improved functional outcome scores
High patient satisfaction
1
We evaluate your symptoms, shoulder stability, dislocation history, strength and movement, review your imaging — including MRI arthrogram and CT bone loss measurements — and consider your activity demands, goals, and lifestyle. If additional imaging is needed, it can be ordered.
2
We explain whether rehabilitation or surgical stabilization is appropriate based on your labral injury, bone loss, dislocation pattern, and goals — and which procedure provides the most durable stability for your specific anatomy.
3
If surgery is recommended, our fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons perform the appropriate stabilization procedure — arthroscopic Bankart repair, Latarjet coracoid transfer, remplissage, capsulorrhaphy, or revision stabilization — to restore shoulder stability and prevent further dislocation.
4
Our surgeons work closely with physical therapists to guide a structured rehabilitation program that restores motion, strength, and shoulder confidence while protecting the repair.
5
Rehabilitation progresses through milestones so you can confidently return to the activities that matter most — work, exercise, sport, and a life without apprehension.
This long-term follow-up helps us understand how shoulders recover beyond the early healing period — including strength, function, and return to activity. These insights allow our surgeons to continually refine surgical planning and rehabilitation strategies to support durable shoulder
performance over time.
1
Elite surgeons with decades of experience, incentivized to do the right thing
2
Prevent future surgeries
3
Heal with advanced, minimally invasive techniques
4
Preserve your natural joints, whenever possible
5
Seamless coordination from injury to recovery
6
Premium personalized care, made accessible
7
All patient outcomes tracked for 5 years
The shoulder labrum is a ring of fibrocartilage that surrounds and deepens the shoulder socket (glenoid). The labrum works to:
Â
Â
A Bankart lesion — the most common structural finding after shoulder dislocation — is a detachment of the anterior-inferior labrum from the glenoid rim. When this anchor tears away, the shoulder loses its primary structural defense against dislocation and is predisposed to re-dislocation with overhead and external rotation movements.
Shoulder dislocation and instability can cause several symptoms depending on severity and how long the problem has been developing.
Â
Common symptoms include:
Â
Â
Some patients experience progressive instability with worsening over time; others notice sudden onset after a specific traumatic event.
Shoulder instability is typically diagnosed by an orthopedic surgeon who specializes in shoulder and sports medicine conditions.
Â
During evaluation, the surgeon reviews your dislocation history and performs a physical examination including the apprehension test, relocation test, and anterior load and shift to confirm instability pattern and degree.
Â
Imaging studies confirm structural injury and guide surgical planning:
Â
Â
Because imaging findings must be interpreted alongside clinical history and examination, the final diagnosis integrates all three.
Shoulder dislocation and instability are treated by orthopedic surgeons who specialize in shoulder and sports medicine. For the highest level of specialization, look for a fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon.
Â
This training typically includes:
Â
Â
Fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons with specific instability volume have deeper experience in the full spectrum of stabilization procedures — from soft tissue repair to complex bone reconstruction — which matters most in cases involving bone loss, engaging Hill-Sachs, or prior failed surgery.
Patients do not feel pain during shoulder stabilization. The procedure is typically performed under regional anesthesia with sedation or general anesthesia.
Â
After surgery, some discomfort is expected — particularly in the first 48–72 hours. Pain is managed effectively with medication, ice, sling support, and activity modification. Many patients receive a regional nerve block that keeps the shoulder numb for several hours after surgery.
Â
As healing progresses, pain improves steadily. For most patients, the short-term recovery period is worthwhile because successful stabilization eliminates the fear of dislocation, restores shoulder confidence, and allows return to sport and work.
Arthroscopic Bankart repair is a reliable procedure for appropriately selected patients. Latarjet provides even lower re-dislocation rates in bone loss cases.
Â
Outcomes vary with:
Â
Â
In general, patients with minimal bone loss and soft tissue Bankart lesions achieve low re-dislocation rates — approximately 5–10% at 2-year follow-up. In bone loss cases requiring the Latarjet procedure, re-dislocation rates are below approximately 4% at long-term follow-up.
Â
At The Joint Preservation Center, we track outcomes for 5 years because durable stability and apprehension resolution — not just early pain relief — are the true measures of success.
Recovery after shoulder stabilization occurs in phases because the labrum must heal to the glenoid bone.
Â
Â
A structured rehabilitation program and adherence to recovery guidelines play an important role in achieving the best possible outcome — and in resolving apprehension alongside physical function.
Unlike Bankart repair and Latarjet — which restore native tissue and preserve the natural shoulder joint — shoulder replacement involves implanting metal and polyethylene components. Replacement is not a treatment for shoulder instability or Bankart tears.
Â
Â
Shoulder replacement is relevant only in very specific end-stage scenarios — such as glenohumeral arthritis developing after decades of untreated instability, which is precisely the outcome that early stabilization surgery aims to prevent.
There is no universal rule about the number of dislocations required before surgery becomes appropriate. The decision is based on structural factors, not just dislocation count.
Â
Key considerations include:
Â
Â
The right question is not ‘how many?’ but ‘what structural damage has occurred and what is the risk if I wait?’ A comprehensive evaluation with bone loss measurement and clinical examination answers this question more reliably than a dislocation count alone.
Bankart repair reattaches the torn anterior labrum to the glenoid rim using suture anchors — restoring the labral bumper and the attached IGHL without altering bone anatomy. It is performed arthroscopically and is appropriate when bone loss is minimal to moderate.
Â
The Latarjet procedure transfers the coracoid bone with its attached conjoined tendon to the front of the glenoid — restoring the missing bone arc and creating a dynamic muscular sling that actively resists dislocation in the vulnerable arm position. It is an open or mini-open procedure and is appropriate when bone loss exceeds the Bankart threshold, when prior Bankart repair has failed, or in high-demand contact athletes with specific risk factors.
Â
The choice between Bankart repair and Latarjet is determined by glenoid bone loss percentage on CT, Hill-Sachs engagement pattern, dislocation history, tissue quality, and activity demands — not by patient preference alone. We discuss the procedural decision in detail during your consultation based on your specific imaging and clinical findings.
Yes — and it reflects the genuine structural reality of an unstable shoulder. Apprehension after shoulder dislocation is both a psychological experience and a clinical sign of structural damage. Patients who describe avoiding overhead positions, sleeping on their back to protect the shoulder, or withdrawing from sport because of fear are not being avoidant — they are correctly perceiving that the structural restraints against dislocation are compromised.
Â
The fear resolves when the structure is restored. In appropriately selected patients, successful Bankart repair or Latarjet procedure eliminates the apprehension sign and the lived fear of re-dislocation. Return of shoulder confidence — the ability to reach overhead, participate in contact sport, and sleep without apprehension — is one of the most meaningful outcomes patients report after successful stabilization.
Â
If fear of re-dislocation is your primary reason for seeking evaluation, it is a clinically valid reason — and we take it seriously.
Yes. It is common for MRI arthrogram to reveal concurrent pathology alongside anterior instability — including Hill-Sachs lesions requiring remplissage, HAGL lesions on the humeral side, SLAP tears, rotator interval defects, or glenoid bone loss requiring Latarjet.
Â
We routinely address combined shoulder pathology during a single procedure. Bankart repair can be combined with remplissage, Latarjet augmentation, HAGL repair, or capsulorrhaphy — depending on what your imaging and intraoperative findings indicate. Addressing all contributing structures in one operation avoids the need for a second surgery and typically produces better overall outcomes.
Bilateral shoulder instability is managed with a staged approach — one shoulder is stabilized first, and the second is addressed after the first has recovered sufficiently to manage daily activities comfortably. We develop a sequencing plan that minimizes total downtime, which is especially important for patients managing work obligations and family responsibilities.
The Joint Preservation Center accepts most PPO insurance plans that have out-of-network benefits:
Â
If you have a PPO insurance plan with out-of-network benefits:
Â
Â
Note: If you have Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, or VA programs, or if your PPO does not have out-of-network benefits, you can still see our specialists and the surgery center will still be in-network. In this case, our specialists charge $250 for the initial office visit (all follow ups are included). Surgery is typically in the range of $6K – $8K depending on what you need done.
Â
If you are unsure whether your plan is accepted, our team can verify your coverage before your appointment.
*Same-day consultations may be available
*Online visits available
